Agents that argue and explain classifications
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Tool that Enables Agents to Argue
Multi-Agent Systems are suitable to provide a framework that allows to perform collaborative processes in distributed environments. Furthermore, argumentation is a natural way of reaching agreements between several parties. We propose an infrastructure to develop and execute argumentative agents in an open MAS. It offers the tools to develop agents with argumentation capabilities. It also offer...
متن کاملBuilding Agents that Plan and Argue in a Social Context
In order for one agent to meet its goals, it will often need to influence another to act on its behalf, particularly in a society in which agents have heterogenous sets of abilities. To effect such influence, it is necessary to consider both the social context and the dialogical context in which influence is exerted, typically through utterance. Both of these facets, the social and the dialogic...
متن کاملAgents That Explain Their Own Actions
Computer generated battleeeld agents need to be able to explain the rationales for their actions. Such explanations make it easier to validate agent behavior, and can enhance the eeectiveness of the agents as training devices. This paper describes an explanation capability called Debrief that enables agents implemented in Soar to describe and justify their decisions. Debrief determines the moti...
متن کاملAgents that Learn to Explain Themselves
Intelligent artificial agents need to be able to explain and justify their actions. They must therefore understand the rationales for their own actions. This paper describes a technique for acquiring this understanding, implemented in a multimedia explanation system. The system determines the motivation for a decision by recalling the situation in which the decision was made, and replaying the ...
متن کاملWe Can’t Argue Forever
We analyze time-costly decision-making in committees by privately informed individuals, such as juries, panels, boards, etc. In the spirit of the Coase Conjecture, we show that the decision is ‘almost instantaneous’ when individuals entertain identical objectives. Delay can only be understood as the outcome of conflicting (biased) objectives.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1387-2532,1573-7454
DOI: 10.1007/s10458-007-9025-6